eCircuit  Center 
Error Budget Analysis

About SPICE | SPICE Basics | Running SPICE | CIRCUIT COLLECTION
SPICE Commands | SPICE Downloads | About | Contact | Home

Case Study:
Which Amplifier has Lower Errors?

Non-Inverting vs. Inverting Op Amp!


pic 

Suppose you had the choice between two amplifiers for a precision front-end design:

Which provides better DC accuracy?

Design Challenge: A sensor can be wired for either polarity (+2V or -2V full-scale). The sensor's signal must be scaled to the input range of an ADC (+4V full scale). We'll perform an error analysis for each amplifier. For the same magnitude in gain

 

Get a refresh of the Non-Inverting and Inverting Op Amp.

For tutorials and other examples, goto EBA Series.

 

OFFSET AND GAIN ERRORS

What are the Offset and Gain Errors of a basic amplifier block?

pic

AMPLIFIERS

Schematics with Error Sources

Non-inverting and Inverting Amps with errors.

 pic

Error Sources

To compare designs, we'll focus on the following initial errors.

Description Initial
OFFSET ERRORS  
voff, Input Offset Voltage
ib, Input Bias Current
1 mV
100 nA
GAIN ERRORS  
R2_Tol, Resistor Tolerance
R1_Tol, Resistor Tolerance
1.0 %
1.0 %

 

Conditions and Assumptions

Non-Inverting Amplifier

Inverting Amplifier

Temperature

Design Constraints

 

OFFSET AND GAIN ERRORS

Let's walk through the error analysis for both amplifiers. For each error we'll show

Description Non-Inv Amplifier Inverting Amplifier
Resistors

Signal Gain
R1=10k, R2=10k

K = vo/vin
   = R2/R1+1
   = +2
R1=10k, R2=20k

K = vo/vin
   = -R2/R1
   = -2
OFFSET ERRORS    
Input Offset Voltage









Input Bias Current
voff = 1mV

S = ∆vo/∆voff
 = R2/R1+1 = +2

Voffset = voff * S
 = 1mV * 2 
 = 2mV


ib = 100 nA

S = ∆vo/∆ib
 = -R2 = -10k

Voffset = ib * S
 = 100 nA * 10k
 = 1mV
voff = 1mV

S = ∆vo/∆voff
 = R2/R1+1 = +3

Voffset = voff * S
 = 1mV * 3 
 = 3 mV


ib = 100 nA

S = ∆vo/∆ib
 = -R2 = -20k

Voffset = ib * S
 = 100 nA * 20k
 = 2mV
GAIN ERRORS    
Resistor R1










Resistor R2
R1_Tol = 1%

S = (∆K/K) / (∆R1/R1)
   = -0.5
   (see Excel file calc)

∆K/K = R1_Tol * S
 = 1% * -0.5
 = -0.5%


R2_Tol = 1%

S = (∆K/K) / (∆R2/R2)
   = +0.5
   (see Excel file calc)

∆K/K = R2_Tol * S
 = 1% * 0.5
 = 0.5%
R1_Tol = 1%

S = (∆K/K) / (∆R1/R1)
   = -1.0
   (see Excel file calc)

∆K/K =  R1_Tol * S
 = 1% * -1.0
 = -1.0%


R2_Tol = 1%

S = (∆K/K) / (∆R2/R2)
   = +1.0
   (see Excel file calc)

∆K/K = R2_Tol * S
 = 1% * 1.0
 = 1.0%

 

SHOWDOWN SUMMARY

Which configuration performed better (lower errors)? The clear WINNER for this design showdown is the Non-Invering Amplifier!

Why? You've likely noticed the Non-Inverting had lower Sensitivities (1.5x to 2x lower) for both the Offset and Gain Errors. To understand better, a question is posed.

Question: Which amplifier config appears below?

 pic

Answer: BOTH!

So what's different?

What about Gains?

 

WHAT ABOUT LARGER GAINS (>10)?

What happens to the error showdown between higher gain ampifiers?

Suppose the desired gain magnitude is +10 V/V for the Non-Inverting (R2=100k) and -10 V/V for the Inverting (R2=110k). You can discover the error results by entering your new values for R2 in the Excel spreadsheet (see link below).

WHAT ABOUT OTHER ERRORS?

For higher precision designs, you might consider additional error parameters (Aol, CMRR, PSRR)! In some cases, the Inverting Amplifier has an advantage! Look for these errors treated in future topics.

EXCEL FILE

Explore the hands-on spreadsheet! Compare the Sensitivities between the two amps highlighted in RED.

TRY IT!

 

For tutorials and other examples, goto EBA Series